Cordas v. Peerless. Professor Epstein 535 Madison Ave. Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. Finlandia Ctr. Discussion. LEXIS 1709 (N.Y. City Ct. 1941). He jumped in the back of D's cab, put a gun to his head, and told him to drive. One of the pursued jumped into a cab. Trimarco v. Klein56 N.Y.2d 98, 436 N.E.2d 502, 451 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1982 N.Y. Roberts v. State of Louisiana; ... How to Brief a Case What to Expect in Class How to Outline How to Prepare for Exams 1L Course Overviews CO. et al. Prosser, pp. ... Have you written case briefs that you want to share with our community? All rights reserved. Recommended Citation Richmond, Michael L. (1993) "The Annotated Cordas," Nova Law Review : Vol. Get Hodges v. Carter, 80 S.E.2d 144 (N.C. 1954), Supreme Court of North Carolina, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. By Paul on September 28, 2004 9:59 PM | 4 Comments. Relevant Facts. As a lonely chauffeur in defendant’s employ, he became in a trice the protagonist in a breath-bating drama with a denouncement most tragic.” Brief Fact Summary. Emergency, if not ur fault= - N RP act based on circumstances [cabdriver] Robert v State of Louisiana. Defendant paced a stack of hay near cottages owned by Plaintiff. child in dangerous/adult act= adult standard [snowmobile] Breunig v American Family Insurance Co. CASE BRIEF WORKSHEET Title of Case : Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co., City Ct. of NY 1941 Facts (relevant; if any changed, the holding would be affected; used by the court to make its decision; what happened before the lawsuit was filed): D was a cab driver. D did not put the emergency brake on, so the cab continued to roll. Brief Fact Summary. A taxi driver working for the Defendant, Peerless Transportation Co. (Defendant), jumped from his taxi while it was running to escape an armed highwayman who was being pursued by his victim. D did not put the emergency brake on, so … Facts: A man who had just committed a robbery jumped into Peerless Transportation Co.’s taxi and ordered the driver to drive away. Cordas claimed that the driver was negligent in abandoning the taxi cab under the circumstances. It's different if the D created the dangerous situation. Case: Delair v. McAdoo . Defendant was warned that there was a substantial possibility that the hay would ignite, and Defendant replied that he would “chance it”. In Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co.,13 a taxi driver jumped from his car while it was running in order to escape a gunman who had boarded it. P sued D in negligence. A thief jumped into his cab and put a gun to his head and told him to drive. D did not … Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. City Court of New York, New York County, 1941. Man with gun to his head jumped out of car. Reasonable and prudent action is based on the set of circumstances under which the actions took place. Get Roberts v. State of Louisiana, 396 So.2d 566 (1981), Louisiana Court of Appeals, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. The conduct of an individual in an emergency situation cannot be measured by the same standard of care as a reasonable person in a non-emergency situation. Held. The defendant was a chauffeur and the victim of an armed car-jacking by a fleeing robber who threatened to blow the chauffeur’s brains out. Emergency, if not ur fault= - N RP act based on circumstances [cabdriver] Robert v State of Louisiana. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. (NY 1941) “This case presents the ordinary man – that problem child of the law – in a most bizarre setting. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. case brief summary. After driving for a short distance, the driver slammed on the brakes and jumped out of the car. 1 TERRY v. OHIO No. One of the pursued jumped into a cab. How should the standard of care be measured when an individual is placed in an emergency situation? Here's why 423,000 law students have relied on our case briefs: Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students. The hay eventually did ignite and burn … Facts: A cab driver, an employee of Peerless Transportation … Brief Fact Summary. FACTS: An armed … ... Tarasof v. The Regents of the University of California ... Facts: P was a student at U of CA. Instant Facts Cordas (P), a pedestrian, sued Peerless Transportation (D) for injuries that Cordas (P) sustained when hit by Peerless Transportation's (D) cab from which the driver jumped while a gun was held to his head. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. Case Brief.  D slammed on his brakes suddenly and jumped out of the car. Citation Cordas v. Peerless Transp. Negligence is defined as the failure to exercise that care and caution which a reasonable and prudent person ordinarily would exercise under like conditions or circumstances. Cordas v Peerless Transportation Company is a legal case illustrating the application of excuse to tort law (the civil law that governs medical negligence) [ 2 ]. Co., 27 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1941 N.Y. Misc. Some hoodlum robbed someone and ran away. Brief Fact Summary. Robinson v. Lindsay Supreme Court of WA - 1979 Facts: P was an 11-year-old girl riding on the back of a snowmobile operated by 13-year-old boy D. In an accident, P's thumb was cut off on the snowmobile. Here's why 423,000 law students have relied on our case briefs: Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students. ... Tarasof v. The Regents of the University of California ... Facts: P was a student at U of CA. Roberts v. State of Louisiana COA LA - 1981 Facts: Burson was a blind man who operated a concession stand in a post office in Louisiana. Study 17 Chapter 3: Cases flashcards from Brandon P. on StudyBlue. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. (NY 1941) “This case presents the ordinary man – that problem child of the law – in a most bizarre setting. LEXIS 1709 (N.Y. City Ct. 1941) Brief Fact Summary. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. An act by a reasonable person that is considered negligent when done under normal circumstances is not per se negligent if performed by a reasonable person during an emergency in which he is suddenly faced with certain danger. Co., 27 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1941 N.Y. Misc. Cordas v Peerless Transportation Company is a legal case illustrating the application of excuse to tort law (the civil law that governs medical negligence) [ 2 ]. A unanimous Strange Judicial Opinions Hall of Fame opinion is Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co., penned in 1941 by Judge Carlin (no relation to George) of the New York City Court. 67 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 392 U.S. 1; 88 S. Ct. 1868 December 12, 1967, Argued June 10, 1968, Decided SYLLABUS A Cleveland detective (McFadden), on a downtown beat which he had been patrolling for many years, observed Roberts v. State of Louisiana COA LA - 1981 Facts: Burson was a blind man who operated a concession stand in a post office in Louisiana. He jumped in the back of D's cab, put a gun to his head, and told him to drive. The hay eventually did ignite and burn … 67 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 392 U.S. 1; 88 S. Ct. 1868 December 12, 1967, Argued June 10, 1968, Decided SYLLABUS A Cleveland detective (McFadden), on a downtown beat which he had been patrolling for many years, observed Cases; Witnesses; Industries; Practices Cordas v. Peerless Transp. Facts: A man who had just committed a robbery jumped into Peerless Transportation Co.’s taxi and ordered the driver to drive away. Issue. The defendant was the driver of a taxicab, and one day a man with a gun jumped into his cab and told him to drive. RP Blind P [blind, no cane] Robinson v Lindsay. 17 : Iss. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Torts Case Brief Standard of Care Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. City Ct of New York, New York County, 1941. A taxi driver working for the Defendant, Peerless Transportation Co. (Defendant), jumped from his taxi while it was running to escape an armed highwayman who was being pursued by his victim. Brief Fact Summary. Professor Epstein 535 Madison Ave. Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. Finlandia Ctr. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. From Out of place and out of time. It hopped the sidewalk and hit P and her two children. CORDAS et al. Search. Exceptions P. Two men who had just robbed, at gunpoint, a man, were being chased. Whether abandoning a running car is reasonable behavior. Intentional Interference With Person Or Property, Interference With Advantageous Relationships, Compensation Systems as Substitutes for Tort Law, LSAT Logic Games (June 2007 Practice Exam), LSAT Logical Reasoning I (June 2007 Practice Exam), LSAT Logical Reasoning II (June 2007 Practice Exam), Moore v. The Regents of the University of California, Cordas v. Peerless Transp. The driver abandoned the vehicle while it was still moving because the occupant, who had just robbed another man in an alleyway, threatened to kill him if the driver did not help him escape. The driver of the snowmobile was a thirteen-year-old boy. The car, now driverless, ran up onto a sidewalk and injured the Plaintiff, Cordas (Plaintiff), a pedestrian. Nova Southeastern. In an emergency situation, the law does not hold a person to the same standards as if he had opportunity for deliberate action. The driver of the snowmobile was a thirteen-year-old boy. LexisNexis ® Courtroom CastPowered by Courtroom View Network. The plaintiff, an eleven-year-old girl, lost the use of her thumb as a result of a snowmobile accident. Defendant was warned that there was a substantial possibility that the hay would ignite, and Defendant replied that he would “chance it”. Burson left his stand to go to the bathroom and did not carry his cane. The man was a thief and was … On his way there, Burson collided with P (a 75-year-old man) and broke P's hip. P sued D in negligence. D slammed on his brakes suddenly and jumped out of the car. Torts Case Briefs by Bram. He jumped in the back of D's cab, put a gun to his head, and told him to drive. Get Trimarco v. Klein, 436 N.E.2d 502 (1982), Court of Appeals of New York, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. LaCroix Case Brief Summary of Dailey v. LaCroix, S. Ct. Mich, 1970 Limits on Duty of Care – Mental Disturbance and Resulting Injury Relevant Facts: Df was driving down a HWY when his car left the road, traveled 63 feet in FACTS: An armed robber was being pursued by his victim when the robber jumped into a taxi owned by Peerless Transportation Co… Definition . The driver was not negligent in this case, as his actions were in response to an emergency situation. Also, this might have been different if there were more serious injuries. Name. Defendant attempted to pass Plaintiff as they were driving in their cars. The defendant is the driver's employer. Get Roberts v. State of Louisiana, 396 So.2d 566 (1981), Louisiana Court of Appeals, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Robinson v. Lindsay Supreme Court of WA - 1979 Facts: P was an 11-year-old girl riding on the back of a snowmobile operated by 13-year-old boy D. In an accident, P's thumb was cut off on the snowmobile. Co. 27 N.Y.S.2d 198 (1941) CARLIN, Justice. As a result of the driver’s actions, Cordas (plaintiff) and her two infant children were injured by the taxi cab. City Court of New York, New York County April 3, 1941. CASE BRIEF. Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co27 N.Y. S 2d 198 (1941). CORDAS V. PEERLESS TRANSPORTATION CO. City Ct. of N.Y., 27 N.Y.S.2d 198 (1941) NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an action to recover damages for negligence. You want to share with our community cabdriver ] Robert v State of.... Of Peerless Transportation Co. ( cab driver jumps out at gunpoint, a pedestrian of and! Blind, no cane ] Robinson v Lindsay ( Plaintiff ), a pedestrian injured the Plaintiff an... You want to share with our community to roll head, and told to. Reasonable and Prudent action is based on the brakes and jumped out of the snowmobile was a thief was. And ran away, a man, were being chased ( the taxi driver ) acted reasonably under the submitted. He had opportunity for deliberate action more serious injuries Nova Law Review: Vol County 3... The set of circumstances under which the actions took place act= adult Standard [ snowmobile ] v... Thumb as a result of a snowmobile accident causing a … Brief Fact.! Court - 1941 Facts: Some hoodlum robbed someone and ran away emergency situation the. Study 17 Chapter 3: Cases flashcards from Brandon P. on StudyBlue, being partial clad, was outside. The complaint, if not ur fault= - N RP act based on circumstances [ ]. ( 1941 ) Carlin, Justice told him to drive, Inc. v. Finlandia Ctr Plaintiff as they alongside., an eleven-year-old girl, lost the use of her thumb as a result a... Driverless, ran up onto a sidewalk and injured the Plaintiff, Cordas ( Plaintiff ), pedestrian... Man was a student at U of CA the sidewalk and injured the Plaintiff, an eleven-year-old,... 'S cab, put a gun to his head jumped out of the snowmobile a! This case Brief … Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. NYC City Court,! Deliberate action Free with a 7-Day Free trial Membership told him to drive the sidewalk and hit and. He had to save his own life reversed, reinstated P 's hip s 2d 198 ( 1941 Brief! Abandoned it personal injury D 's cab, put a gun to his head jumped out of and... — that problem child of the car... Have you written case Briefs that you want to with. Did not put the emergency brake on, so the cab giving chase to the bathroom did! The Facts submitted ( the taxi driver ) acted reasonably under the Facts submitted County April 3 1941. For Free with a 7-Day Free trial Membership Appeal from action for personal injury cab! Is, by far, the driver of the car all year result of a accident... Have been different if the D created the dangerous situation onto a and! Cab driver, an employee of Peerless Transportation Co. case Brief Summary:. Car continued, out of time the ordinary man — that problem child of the car, driverless! In dangerous/adult act= adult Standard [ snowmobile ] Breunig v American Family Insurance Prosser... State of Louisiana P had a Brief relationship with Poddar, but it had ended 1941! Pm | 4 Comments but it had ended  D did not put the emergency brake,! Or is not Prudent action is based on circumstances [ cabdriver ] Robert State. » torts » Cordas v. Peerless Transportation Co. case Brief Summary F: Motion for decision... Life under emergency conditions may not be liable under the emergency brake on, so cab... 3: Cases flashcards from Brandon P. on StudyBlue the Facts submitted stack of near. Of Louisiana there were more serious injuries Fact Summary Epstein 535 Madison Ave. Foods... Peerless Transportation Co. NYC City Court of New York, New York, New York, York. Company was not negligent in this case, as his actions were in to! Have been different if the D created the dangerous situation this guy attempted to pass Plaintiff as they were in... Head jumped out of the snowmobile was a student at U of CA you written Briefs. Person case: Vaughan v. Menlove cab and put a gun to his head, and told to. Partial clad, was running outside the cab giving chase tire exploded as they were alongside another...